How Second and Third Generic Drugs Drive Down Prescription Prices

How Second and Third Generic Drugs Drive Down Prescription Prices

When a brand-name drug loses its patent, the first generic version usually hits the market at about 15% to 20% of the original price. That’s a big drop. But here’s what most people don’t realize: the real savings don’t come from the first generic. They come from the second and third ones.

Why the second generic changes everything

The moment a second company starts selling the same drug as the first generic, prices don’t just dip-they plunge. According to the FDA’s 2022 analysis of drugs approved between 2018 and 2020, the first generic typically cuts the brand price to about 87% of what it used to be. That sounds like progress, but it’s not enough. When the second generic enters, that number drops to 58%. That’s more than half the original cost, all because another manufacturer decided to make the same pill.

This isn’t magic. It’s basic economics. When there’s only one seller, they have little reason to lower prices further. But add a second seller, and suddenly they’re in a race. Who can make it cheaper? Who can deliver faster? Who can offer better terms to pharmacies and insurers? The pressure is real. And it shows up in your co-pay.

The third generic hits the sweet spot

Now add a third generic manufacturer. Prices drop again-to 42% of the original brand price. That’s more than half the cost of the first generic. In some cases, drugs that once cost $100 a month drop to under $40. For patients on long-term meds-like blood pressure pills, statins, or diabetes drugs-that’s life-changing.

The Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation at HHS found that markets with three or more generic makers see price reductions of about 20% within three years, and those with 10 or more manufacturers see drops of 70% to 80%. The biggest savings don’t come from having five or ten options. They come from having three.

Think of it like this: one generic is a discount. Three generics are a sale. And if you’re paying out of pocket, that difference can mean choosing between refilling your prescription or skipping it.

What happens when competition stalls

Here’s the scary part: nearly half of all generic drug markets in the U.S. are stuck with just two manufacturers. That’s called a duopoly. And in those markets, prices don’t keep falling. They sometimes go up.

A 2017 study from the University of Florida found that when a third generic fails to enter the market-because of manufacturing delays, regulatory hurdles, or even corporate consolidation-prices can jump by 100% to 300%. One drug, a common antibiotic, went from $12 for a 30-day supply to $45 in just two years after the third manufacturer exited. Why? Because the two remaining companies stopped competing. They started pricing like a cartel.

This isn’t theoretical. It’s happening right now. When companies like Teva and Viatris buy up smaller generic makers, they reduce the number of independent players. Fewer players mean less pressure to lower prices. And that’s exactly what happened after the Mylan-Upjohn merger in 2020. The number of independent generic manufacturers shrank. So did the price drops.

Two corporate CEOs celebrating over a broken third generic pill, patient watching helplessly.

Who’s blocking the third generic?

You’d think more companies would rush in to make cheap, profitable generic drugs. But they don’t always. Why?

One reason is pay-for-delay deals. That’s when the original brand company pays a generic maker to wait before launching their version. These deals are legal loopholes that keep prices high. The Blue Cross Blue Shield Association estimates these agreements cost patients $3 billion a year in higher out-of-pocket costs.

Another is patent thickets. Brand companies file dozens of overlapping patents-sometimes 50, 70, even 75-to stretch their monopoly beyond the original 20-year term. One blockbuster drug held off generics for nearly two decades longer than it should have. That’s not innovation. That’s legal obstruction.

And then there’s the supply chain. Three big wholesalers-McKesson, AmerisourceBergen, and Cardinal Health-control 85% of the market. Three pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs)-Express Scripts, CVS Health, and UnitedHealth’s Optum-handle 80% of prescriptions. These middlemen have so much power, they can pressure generic makers to cut prices so low that they can’t stay in business. The result? Fewer companies dare to enter the market. And the ones that do get squeezed out.

Why this matters for everyday patients

Let’s say you take a generic statin. The brand cost $200 a month. The first generic dropped it to $175. The second brought it to $115. The third brought it to $85. Now imagine the third never came. You’re stuck paying $115. That’s $360 more a year. Over five years? $1,800. That’s a month’s rent. A car payment. A vacation.

The FDA says the 2,400 new generic drugs approved between 2018 and 2020 saved Americans $265 billion. That’s not a number. That’s millions of people who could afford their meds because the third generic showed up.

It’s not just about money. It’s about access. When drugs are cheaper, people refill more. Hospitalizations drop. Chronic conditions improve. The health system saves more than it spends.

Patient using GoodRx app to drop drug prices, PBMs trying to pull prices back with fishing rods.

What’s being done-and what’s not

There are efforts to fix this. The CREATES Act, passed in 2022, stops brand companies from blocking generic makers from getting samples needed to prove their drug works. The Preserve Access to Affordable Generics Act targets pay-for-delay deals. The FDA’s GDUFA III program, running through 2027, is speeding up approvals for complex generics.

But progress is slow. The Congressional Budget Office warns that without stronger action, Medicare will spend $25 billion more a year by 2030 because generic competition isn’t happening fast enough.

Meanwhile, the market keeps shifting. The biggest generic makers are getting bigger. Smaller ones are getting bought out. And the third generic? It’s becoming rarer.

What you can do

You can’t control who makes your drug. But you can control what you ask for.

Ask your pharmacist: “Is there another generic version available?” If they say no, ask why. If the answer is “only two companies make it,” that’s a red flag. Ask your doctor to prescribe the brand-name drug if it’s cheaper than the current generic. That sounds backwards, but sometimes it’s true.

Use price-comparison tools. GoodRx, SingleCare, and even your insurer’s app can show you which pharmacy has the lowest price for which generic. Don’t assume the first generic is the cheapest.

Speak up. If your drug price jumps unexpectedly, contact your state’s attorney general. File a complaint with the FDA’s MedWatch program. Demand transparency.

The system isn’t broken. It’s being manipulated. And the only thing that’s kept prices low so far is the simple, stubborn fact that when a third company enters the room, the price drops.

What happens when no third generic enters

The data is clear: markets with only two generic manufacturers don’t just miss out on savings-they become unstable. Prices rise. Supply chains crack. Shortages happen.

Take the case of injectable epinephrine. When only two companies made the generic version, prices doubled. Then one company stopped making it. The other raised prices again. Patients couldn’t get it. Schools, airlines, and emergency rooms scrambled.

That’s what happens when competition dies.

The entry of the second and third generic isn’t just good economics. It’s public health.

Why do generic drug prices drop more after the third manufacturer enters?

When only one or two companies make a generic drug, they have little incentive to lower prices further. But when a third company enters, they compete aggressively on price to win contracts with pharmacies and insurers. This drives prices down sharply-often to 42% of the original brand price. The FDA found that each additional generic competitor after the first leads to a 20-30% further price reduction.

Are all generic drugs the same?

Yes, legally. The FDA requires that all generic drugs have the same active ingredient, strength, dosage form, and route of administration as the brand-name drug. They must also meet the same strict standards for safety and effectiveness. The only differences are in inactive ingredients, packaging, or manufacturer-none of which affect how the drug works in your body.

Why do some generic drugs cost more than others?

Price differences come from market competition, not quality. If only two companies make a drug, they may charge more because there’s no pressure to lower prices. If five companies make it, prices drop. Also, some pharmacies or PBMs negotiate better deals with certain manufacturers, so the same drug can cost $5 at one pharmacy and $15 at another. Always check multiple sources.

Can I ask my doctor to prescribe a brand-name drug if it’s cheaper than the generic?

Yes, absolutely. Sometimes, especially in markets with limited generic competition, the brand-name drug can be cheaper than the only two available generics. Your doctor can write a prescription that says “dispense as written” or “no substitutions.” Pharmacies are required to honor that if the brand is cheaper. Always compare prices first.

How do pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) affect generic drug prices?

PBMs negotiate discounts with drug manufacturers and pharmacies, but they also control which generics are covered and at what price. In markets with many generic makers, PBMs get bigger discounts. But in duopolies, they have less leverage. Some PBMs even favor certain manufacturers through rebates, which can reduce competition. This can lead to higher prices for patients if the preferred generic isn’t the cheapest.

What’s the difference between a first, second, and third generic?

The first generic is the first company to launch after the brand’s patent expires. The second and third are other companies that follow. Each new entrant increases competition. The first may cut the price by 15-30%. The second can cut it by another 30-40%. The third often pushes it down to under half the brand price. More entrants mean more savings.

Comments

Image placeholder

Ravinder Singh

November 19, 2025 AT 18:17

Wow, this is the kind of post that makes me feel hopeful again 🙌
Had no idea the third generic was the real game-changer. My dad’s blood pressure med dropped from $90 to $32 after the third maker showed up. He cries every time he picks it up-no joke.
People think generics are all the same, but competition? That’s the invisible hero.
Thanks for spelling it out like this. More posts like this, please.

Image placeholder

Russ Bergeman

November 21, 2025 AT 07:13

So… you’re saying the government should force more companies to make pills? LOL.
Next you’ll tell me we need more taco trucks to lower guac prices.
Free market, people. Let the big boys play.

Image placeholder

Dana Oralkhan

November 21, 2025 AT 20:38

I’ve been on statins for 12 years. When my pharmacy switched from the first generic to the third, my co-pay went from $45 to $12.
I didn’t know why-until now.
This isn’t just about money. It’s about dignity. Being able to take your meds without choosing between groceries and refills?
That’s not a policy issue. That’s a human right.
Thank you for writing this.

Image placeholder

Ron and Gill Day

November 23, 2025 AT 08:36

Ugh. Another woke economic fantasy. The FDA? Please. They’re a rubber stamp for Big Pharma.
Third generics? More like third-rate manufacturers cutting corners.
And don’t get me started on GoodRx-those apps are just middlemen selling your data.
Real solution? Abolish patents entirely. Not more bureaucracy.

Image placeholder

Aruna Urban Planner

November 24, 2025 AT 21:19

The structural dynamics here align with oligopolistic market equilibrium models, particularly in the context of Bertrand competition with capacity constraints.
Incremental entrants induce price elasticity thresholds that disrupt rent-seeking behavior.
However, the PBM consolidation factor introduces a non-price barrier that subverts competitive equilibrium-effectively creating a pseudo-monopsony.
Policy interventions must target vertical integration asymmetries, not merely entry thresholds.

Image placeholder

Kristi Bennardo

November 25, 2025 AT 04:20

THIS IS A SCANDAL. A COMPLETE AND UTTER SCANDAL.
People are DYING because some corporate lawyer filed a patent on a molecule that shouldn’t have been patentable in the first place.
And you know who’s laughing? The CEOs of Teva and Viatris. They’re on vacation in the Maldives while grandmas skip insulin.
Someone needs to go to jail. Not fines. JAIL.

Image placeholder

Shiv Karan Singh

November 25, 2025 AT 07:19

LMAO you guys are so gullible.
Third generic? More like third scam.
They all use the same factory in China anyway.
Who cares if it’s ‘generic’ if it’s all the same pill?
And GoodRx? That’s just a front for the insurance companies.
Wake up.
💊

Image placeholder

Ravi boy

November 25, 2025 AT 09:56

bro i just asked my pharmacist for the cheapest one and he gave me the third generic and i paid 8 bucks
no cap
no one talks about this
but its real
just ask for the cheapest one
theyll give it to you
also my aunt in delhi pays 2 rupees for her blood pressure pill
weird world

Image placeholder

Matthew Karrs

November 25, 2025 AT 23:03

What if this is all a psyop?
What if the ‘third generic’ is actually a front for the same company that owns the brand?
They create fake competitors to make it look like competition exists.
And then they raise prices when you’re hooked.
Think about it.
They’ve been doing this since the 1980s.
It’s all controlled.
Nothing’s real.

Image placeholder

Matthew Peters

November 27, 2025 AT 22:56

I didn’t believe this until I saw my neighbor’s prescription receipt.
Same drug. Same dose.
First generic: $110.
Second: $75.
Third: $38.
And the pills? Identical.
I stared at them for ten minutes.
Same color. Same shape. Same imprint.
But one cost three times more.
That’s not capitalism.
That’s theft.
And it’s legal.

Image placeholder

Liam Strachan

November 29, 2025 AT 18:41

Fascinating breakdown. Really puts the human cost into perspective.
Reminds me of how the NHS handles generics here-once a drug goes off-patent, they automatically switch to the cheapest available, no questions asked.
Simple. Effective.
Maybe we need to borrow that model.
Not that it’s perfect, but the intent is clear: patient care first.

Image placeholder

Gerald Cheruiyot

December 1, 2025 AT 06:30

It’s wild how something so simple-adding one more manufacturer-can flip the entire system.
It’s like adding a third person to a two-person argument.
Suddenly, no one can just stare at each other and refuse to move.
Someone has to blink.
And that blink? It saves lives.
Not because of policy.
Because of human nature.
Competition isn’t evil.
It’s just the way we’re wired.

Write a comment